US Gov: Second Court Case Quiz

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

15 Terms

1
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
A private organization is allowed, under certain criteria, to exclude a person from membership through their First Amendment right to freedom of association in spite of state antidiscrimination laws.
New cards
2
Everson v Board of Education
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is incorporated against the states. However, the Supreme Court found that the New Jersey law was not in violation of the Establishment Clause.
New cards
3
Texas v Johnson
A statute that criminalizes the desecration of the American flag violates the First Amendment.
New cards
4
Mapp v Ohio
The Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth, excludes unconstitutionally obtained evidence from use in criminal prosecutions.
New cards
5
Gitlow v New York
The freedom of speech guarantee of the First Amendment applies to the states as well as the federal government through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
New cards
6
Dred Scott v Sandford
Slaves are not citizens of the United States, the Missouri Compromise is illegal, and the federal government is prohibited from freeing slaves brought into federal territories.
New cards
7
Weeks v United States
The warrantless seizure of documents from a private home violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures, and evidence obtained in this manner is excluded from use in federal criminal prosecutions.
New cards
8
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Numbered racial quotas for college admission are illegal. However, race may be used as a factor when awarding admissions.
New cards
9
Miranda v Arizona
The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination requires law enforcement officials to advise a suspect interrogated in custody of his rights to remain silent and to obtain an attorney.
New cards
10
Plessy v Ferguson
This case supported the concept of "separate but equal".
New cards
11
Griswold v Connecticut
A law criminalizing contraceptives violates the right to marital privacy.
New cards
12
New York Times v Sullivan
A newspaper cannot be sued for making false defamatory statements about a public official because those statements were not made with knowing or reckless disregard for the truth.
New cards
13
Lawrence v Texas
This case ruled that state law may not ban sexual relations between same-sex partners. Citizens have a constitutional right to privacy.
New cards
14
Printz v United States
This case ruled that the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act's interim provision that the "chief law enforcement officer" (CLEO) of each local jurisdiction to conduct background checks is unconstitutional.
New cards
15
Alden v Maine
This case states that states are immune from cases brought against them in federal court.
New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 41 people
872 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 25 people
1055 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 34 people
1551 days ago
4.3(4)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
1392 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 30 people
220 days ago
4.5(4)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9 people
1341 days ago
4.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
526 days ago
3.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
366 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (94)
studied byStudied by 168 people
841 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (40)
studied byStudied by 133 people
574 days ago
4.3(7)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 4 people
627 days ago
5.0(4)
robot