History of Forensic Science

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

34 Terms

1
New cards
Sung T'zu
Recorded observations of the usefulness of entomology (study of insects) in solving crimes
2
New cards
Sir Thomas Brown
an English physician, biologist, philosopher, and historian, for many a pioneering forensic archaeologist, discovers adipocere
3
New cards
Mathieu Orfila
"father of modern toxicology", developed tests for the presence of blood in a forensic context, used microscopes on blood and semen stains
4
New cards
Dr. Henry Faulds
forwards an explanation of his fingerprint classification system to Sir Charles DARWIN
5
New cards
Alphonse Bertillon
French police officer and biometrics researcher who applied the anthropological technique of anthropometry to law enforcement
6
New cards
Alexandre Lacassagn
Principle founder in the fields of medical jurisprudence and criminal anthropology (skeletal remains)
7
New cards
Sir Francis Galton
pioneer in fingerprint identification, the first to show scientifically how fingerprints could be used to identify individuals
8
New cards
Karl Landsteiner
Discovered that blood can be grouped into different types, A, B, AB and O.
9
New cards
Edmond Locard
known as the father of Forensic Science, known for his Exchange Principle that "Every contact leaves a trace", 12 matching points as a positive fingerprint identification
10
New cards
Calvin Goddard
developed the science of identifying fired bullets and empty cartridge cases, known as forensic ballistics
11
New cards
Sir Alec Jeffreys
discovers a method of identifying individuals from DNA
12
New cards
Frye v. the United States
All evidence must be meaningful a relevant to the case and scientific community
13
New cards
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Expert Witness Standard: Guidelines set in place that all evidence and experts need to be held to same standard. All must be tested, peer reviewed, contain percent error
Judge makes final decision if a witness is an expert in their field
14
New cards
Mincey v. Arizona
All evidence collected from a CS must be warranted unless for reasons where a warrantless search is applicable
15
New cards
Kumho Tire v. Carmichael
Expert needs to employ the same rigor to any expert in their field whether it be scientific or not
16
New cards
Joiner v. General Electric
Conclusions and methodology are not separate. There was too great of a gap between data and opinion - there needs to be a link from data to evidence
17
New cards
United States v. Prime
Created a standard nine-point scale used to express the degree to which the examiner believes the handwriting samples match was established under the auspices of the American Society for Testing and Materials ('ASTM'). The court reasonably concluded that any lack of standardization is not in and of itself a bar to admissibility in court
18
New cards
US Constitution
interpretation and implementation of US Constitution; deals with fundamental relationships in our society; among states, states & fed gov, rights of individuals in relation to fed & state governments; Supreme Court interprets Constitution
19
New cards
Bill of Rights
-lists specific prohibitions on governmental power; lists of limits on government power
- right of individuals to speak and worship freely
20
New cards
Criminal Law
-prosecution by the government of a person for an act that has been classified as a crime
-an act or omission in violation of a public law forbidding or commanding it federal and state laws that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by imprisonment and/or fines
21
New cards
Probable cause
-requirement found in 4th amendment that must be met before police can make an arrest, conduct a search or receive a warrant
-courts find reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search)
-circumstances can justify a warrantless search
22
New cards
Probative
evidence that establishes or contributes to proof of fact or issue
23
New cards
Hearsay
-statement made out of court that is offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted
-Federal Rules of Evidence prohibits most statements made outside a courtroom from being used as evidence in court (not normally made under oath
-judge/jury cannot observe demeanor of person making statement/opposing party cannot cross-examine person making statement]
24
New cards
Nolo contendere
plea in a criminal proceeding - a person does not accept or deny responsibility for the charges but agrees to accept the punishment; differs from guilty plea because can't be used against a defendant in another cause of action (ie civil)
25
New cards
Alford Plea
-An Alford Plea is a guilty plea of a defendant who proclaims he is innocent of the crime and admits that the prosecution has enough evidence to prove that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
-It is entered when an accused, together with his attorney, has made the calculated decision to plead guilty because the evidence against him is so strong that it will likely lead to a conviction.
-Typically, it results in a guilty plea of a lesser crime (i.e. second-degree murder rather than first
26
New cards
Arrest Warrant
papers issued by the courts that authorize the police to take suspected criminals into custody and hold them until they can be brought to trial; can be issued from a criminal complaint or indictment; have to convince the court that there is probable cause
27
New cards
Arraignment
-after an arrest, booking and initial bail phases comes 1st state of courtroom based proceedings
-person charge with a crime called before a judge to have charges read, inquire about the need for an attorney
-ask how defendant pleads; decide whether to alter bail; announce dates of future proceedings
28
New cards
Preliminary Hearing
criminal law - hearing to determine if a person charged with a felony (a serious crime punishable by a term in prison) should be tried for the crime charged based on whether there is some substantial evidence that he/she committed the crime
29
New cards
Indict
charge of a felony voted by a grand jury based on a proposed charge, witness testimony and other evidence presented by a prosecutor; grand jury does not find guilt, but the only probability that a crime was committed, that the accused person did it, and the person should be tried.
30
New cards
Plea Bargaining
agreements between defendants and prosecutors where defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from prosecutors
31
New cards
Violation
offense not including traffic infraction where the potential sentence cannot be greater than 15 days in jail; violation is not a crime; pleading guilty does not give a criminal record
32
New cards
Infraction
violation of a particular stature for which the penalty is minor (parking infraction); breach of a law or agreement
33
New cards
Misdemeanor
-offense not including traffic violation; potential sentence exceeds 15 days but cannot be greater than one year in jail
-less serious than a felony, more serious than an infraction - fine or incarceration in a local jail
34
New cards
Felony
-an offense where the punishment may exceed one-year maximum
-imprisonment in a prison rather than a county or local jail